nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 news


From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:17:28 +0200


Of course, that's a business decision, but may be instead of getting a new
check for the IPv6 service, not providing it, you will lost some checks from
existing customers who demand dual stack ;-)

Business is also be competitive, and other carriers already have the service
as a value added to the existing IPv4 customers.

Regards,
Jordi




De: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu>
Fecha: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:55:09 +0000 (GMT)
Para: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
CC: Peter Lothberg <roll () Stupi SE>, <nanog () nanog org>
Asunto: Re: IPv6 news



On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jeroen Massar wrote:

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 11:05 -0700, Peter Lothberg wrote:

Is there anyone who can talk to it using IPv6 on the Nanog list?

(Time20.Stupi.SE, 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020)

As a certain "Tier 1" still uses a mesh of tunnels and uses Viagenie in
Canada as their transit provider latency to the above IP is in the area
of 300ms, going transatlantic twice. IPv4 latency is only 66ms though.
I do hope that some "Tier 1's" get their act together and start doing
native IPv6. I already once suggested upgrading their hardware to
them ;)

I also presume you sent them a check and showed them the business case for
the upgrade? No large provider is going to upgrade anything without a
business reason. Oh, and some parts, critical parts even, of v6 are still
'broken'...




************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Information available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.




Current thread: