nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () Stupi SE>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:05:58 PDT
so having dual stack backbones is very important. but ...
Other global providers have a IPv6 network to, all open for business, but there are very VERY few customers. And, I'm not so sure we even have a "Internet" of IPv6 out there either. It looks cold and empty to me. Here's a challange, have NTP server attached directly to a good clock and a IPv6 network. Is there anyone who can talk to it using IPv6 on the Nanog list? (Time20.Stupi.SE, 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020) -Peter
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Chris Adams (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)