nanog mailing list archives

Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making


From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:16:58 -0500 (EST)


On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christian Kuhtz wrote:

How so? Haven't we recently seen an across the board bug in
multiple version of $vendor code?

And that's evidence of what other than nobody is willing to pay for what it
takes to get better code out of $vendor?

Code can be built better.  It just isn't always economical to do so.

In some business models.

Financial reports regularly hint that $vendor has margins far exceeding the
costs necessity to clean up security-critical code.  When the aggregate
margins drop thanks to folks choosing $vendor2 because $vendor has decided
to let security flaws stew, it's time for $vendor to reevaluate that
business model -- at least a little.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>


Current thread: