nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:50:42 +0000
On Monday 07 Nov 2005 3:42 pm, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
It's an argument for vendor diversity.
No it is an argument for code base diversity (or better software engineering). Vendor diversity doesn't necessarily give you this, and you can get this with one vendor. Vendor diversity might be a good idea, but for other reasons.
Current thread:
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making, (continued)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making James Baldwin (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Eric Germann (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Blaine Christian (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Blaine Christian (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Tom Sands (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Warren Kumari (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Roy S. Rapoport (Nov 08)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Simon Waters (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- RE: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Michael . Dillon (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Todd Vierling (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Chris Woodfield (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Joseph S D Yao (Nov 07)