nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making
From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch () corp earthlink net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:23:05 -0500
On Nov 7, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
On Monday 07 Nov 2005 3:42 pm, Hannigan, Martin wrote:It's an argument for vendor diversity.No it is an argument for code base diversity (or better software engineering). Vendor diversity doesn't necessarily give you this, and you can get this with one vendor.How so? Haven't we recently seen an across the board bug in multiple version of $vendor code?
And that's evidence of what other than nobody is willing to pay for what it takes to get better code out of $vendor?
Code can be built better. It just isn't always economical to do so.
Current thread:
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making, (continued)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Blaine Christian (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Tom Sands (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Warren Kumari (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Roy S. Rapoport (Nov 08)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Simon Waters (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- RE: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Michael . Dillon (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Todd Vierling (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Christian Kuhtz (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Chris Woodfield (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Joseph S D Yao (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Joseph S D Yao (Nov 07)
- Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Edward B. Dreger (Nov 11)