![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]]
From: Tom Vest <tvest () pch net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:25:28 -0500
On Mar 29, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Tom Vest wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:Maybe I'm wrong, i checked with renesys and their data has 701 with 5200 adjacencies followed by 1239 with 3500 anyway i care enough to have snipped thedata.Does anyone know how many of these adjacencies are with single-homed ASNs, i.e., ASNs that are out-of-spec and likely artifacts of previous M&A transactions?Tom
Current thread:
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]], (continued)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Randy Bush (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Tom Vest (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Michael . Dillon (Mar 29)