nanog mailing list archives
Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]]
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:59:14 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
and if you peer with all networks in the 'transit free zone' then you too become transit free also.er.. hate to rain on your parade but if I peer with everyone
these are not the words of someone hating to rain on me!
i need/want to exchange traffic with, i am transit-free, even if I -NEVER- touch any other part of the commercial Internet...
mmm yeah but in the context we have here of ISPs providing connectivity to other ISPs or enterprises this isnt very realistic so i dont see the point of arguing the technicality.
my packets get to where they need to go and all packets I want get to me. my life is good ... even if I only appear as vestigal to the commercial Internet, if I appear at all.
sounds more like an enterprise with specific requirements to connect to a limited part of the internet.. this is not the sort of ISP operation that i am working in.
how would you classify such a network? T1, T2, ODDBALL-0, non-Internet-265, ???
enterprise Steve
Current thread:
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]], (continued)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Alex Bligh (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Randy Bush (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] John Dupuy (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Randy Bush (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Tom Vest (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 29)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Michael . Dillon (Mar 29)