nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft
From: James Galvin <galvin+nanog () elistx com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:28:04 -0500
--On Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:58 PM -0500 David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com> wrote:
ICANN Blames Melbourne IT for Panix Domain Hijacking
Unfortunately, the agenda for the next ICANN meeting: <http://www.icann.org/meetings/mardelplata/> Still does not yet show that the SSAC <http://www.icann.org/committees/security/> Will be having a public meeting on Tuesday, from 6:30-7:30pm, during which it will present its preliminary results and recommendations from its review of the incident. The meeting was requested to be held in the plenary room. If it is it will be webcast, etc., just as all the main meetings are. It is not my place to speak for the committee but I can tell you that PR information that has been released (although I haven't seen it published anywhere yet) points out that the committee took a broader view of the incident, looking at the interactions throughout the system, and will have some things to say that are somewhat critical of more than just Melbourne IT. Sorry but the presentation will probably not be public until just before the meeting. Anybody who wants an official comment or more detailed information in advance of the presentation should contact the Chair, Steve Crocker. Jim Provider of "staff" support to the SSAC
Current thread:
- ICANN on the panix.com theft David Lesher (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft David Lesher (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft David Lesher (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft David Lesher (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft James Galvin (Mar 28)
- Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft Doug Barton (Mar 29)