Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>]

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, David Lesher wrote:

> > > ICANN Blames Melbourne IT for Panix Domain Hijacking
>
> I also don't see any discussion on what ICANN was during during the
> hijack situation; maybe I missed that part.

i dont believe this is icanns responsibility.. it is however their 
responsibility to ensure proper registry procedures are put in place to prevent 
this kind of occurance and provide emergency procedures for reversals when 
problems such as suspected hijacks are encountered.

Steve