nanog mailing list archives
Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:40:59 -0800 (PST)
> I like BGP more as I could transport that /32 with no-export > right away. Yes, in a simple hub-and-spoke anycast topology, iBGP is simplest. In a wagon-wheel or mesh topology, having an IGP makes some things simplest, though you can still use iBGP in that role. -Bill
Current thread:
- Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Joe Shen (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Alexander Koch (Mar 26)
- MARP (was Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 28)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 28)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Alexander Koch (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited just me (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 27)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Edward B. Dreger (Mar 27)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Joe Shen (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 30)