nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP phishing
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:10:10 +0100
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
We dont do sender rewriting / envelope rewriting for forwarded email, just pass it on We'll prepend Resent: headers though .. that should be enough
That's not permitted by RFC 2822 and it'll cause interoperability problems with software that only implements RFC 822 Resent- semantics (only one group of Resent- fields). AFAIK most software that understands Resent- fields does not understand RFC 2822 multiple Resent- groups. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP phishing, (continued)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Mike Leber (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Niels Bakker (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing Todd Vierling (Jun 29)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP phishing Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing Robert Boyle (Jun 28)