nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP phishing
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:10:04 +0530
On 29/06/05, william(at)elan.net <william () elan net> wrote:
Another issue is that are doing the forwarding are the ones that are most often least maintained as far as upgrading software and enabling new SMTP features. As a result an idea that we will ask all forwarders to change and identify themselves in forwarded mail can not happen as quickly as path authentication proponents want.
Please name a few names on just who is not enabling "new smtp features" And what "smtp features" you'd like enabled. RFC 2822 / ESMTP hasnt changed all that much, and then there's SES, which if you call an SMTP feature, I'd beg to differ on that ..
Current thread:
- Re: ISP phishing, (continued)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Paul Wouters (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Robert Boyle (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Mike Leber (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Niels Bakker (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing Todd Vierling (Jun 29)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP phishing Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing Robert Boyle (Jun 28)