nanog mailing list archives
Re: London incidents
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:21:24 -0400
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu> writes:
In message <87mzotpkm7.fsf () valhalla seastrom com>, "Robert E.Seastrom" writes:Brad Knowles <brad () stop mail-abuse org> writes:There were lower levels of priority that you could also use, but "flash" was the top one that I heard about.The four buttons on the "1633" row of an AUTOVON telephone are labeled P, I, F, and FO for Priority, Immediate, Flash, and Flash-Override. The fifth (normal) level is of course routine, with no priority code attached.And those levels appear as the TOS bits in RFC 791....
Yes, but nobody ever wrote a song about the TOS bits in Internet Protocol (this song dates to 1980): http://www.poppyfields.net/filks/00182.html ---Rob
Current thread:
- RE: London incidents, (continued)
- RE: London incidents Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- RE: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- Re: London incidents Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Scott W Brim (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Sean Donelan (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Bill Nash (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Mark Newton (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents sthaug (Jul 12)
- RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 12)