nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: DNS .US outage
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:53:38 +0530
On 11/07/05, Church, Chuck <cchurch () netcogov com> wrote:
One thing to note is that when you use dig or nslookup or whatever, it'll also be using some ephemeral port, so it'll work, even when the lookups from source port 53 wouldn't. Again, I haven't checked since that night to see if that's gone away, so it might be a moot point now.
Hold on now - dig or nslookup query the local resolver with that ephemeral port. If this behavior you describe still exists on the resolver (query from port 53 and not ephemeral ports) then you still wouldnt get a result -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: DNS .US outage, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS .US outage Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 07)
- RE: DNS .US outage Brad Knowles (Jul 07)
- Re: DNS .US outage Michael Painter (Jul 07)
- Re: DNS .US outage Steven J. Sobol (Jul 09)
- Re: DNS .US outage Rodney Joffe (Jul 06)
- Re: DNS .US outage Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 07)
- Re: DNS .US outage Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jul 07)
- RE: DNS .US outage Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 07)
- Re: FW: DNS .US outage Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 11)