nanog mailing list archives
Re: London incidents
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:56:00 -0400
Brad Knowles <brad () stop mail-abuse org> writes:
There were lower levels of priority that you could also use, but "flash" was the top one that I heard about.
The four buttons on the "1633" row of an AUTOVON telephone are labeled P, I, F, and FO for Priority, Immediate, Flash, and Flash-Override. The fifth (normal) level is of course routine, with no priority code attached. My understanding is that many (most?) phones could not issue the higher priority levels. Don't want some E-2 in a guard shack to misdial a number and knock off a four-star who's speaking with the Joint Chiefs. :) ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: London incidents, (continued)
- Re: London incidents Sean Donelan (Jul 09)
- Re: London incidents Spencer Wood (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Sean Donelan (Jul 09)
- RE: London incidents Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- RE: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Scott W Brim (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Sean Donelan (Jul 11)
- RE: London incidents Bill Nash (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 11)
- Re: London incidents Mark Newton (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)