nanog mailing list archives
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:00:16 +0300
Crist Clark wrote:
And the counter point to that argument is that the sparse population of IPv6 space will make systematic scanning by worms an ineffective means of propagation.
Any by connecting to one of the p2p overlay networks you'll have a few million in-use addresses momentarily.
Pete
Current thread:
- mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Dave Crocker (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Tony Hain (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Petri Helenius (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fred Baker (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)