![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:53:27 -0400
On 2005-07-07, at 10:10, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
Anyone here care to share operator perspectives shim6 and the like? Dowe actually have anything that anyone considers workable (not whethersomebody can make it happen, but viable in a commercial environment) formh?
There is no operational or implementation experience with shim6 at this time, that I know of (the technical specifications for shim6 are currently incomplete). The shim6 working group has its first meeting in August in Paris, after which the goal is to progress quickly to a set of specifications which can be implemented.
As an easy-to-read overview of the shim6 approach, the following rough draft may be useful:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-shim6-arch-00.txt Joe
Current thread:
- mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Dave Crocker (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Tony Hain (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Petri Helenius (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)