nanog mailing list archives
mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
From: "Kuhtz, Christian" <christian.kuhtz () bellsouth com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:10:44 -0500
Anyone here care to share operator perspectives shim6 and the like? Do we actually have anything that anyone considers workable (not whether somebody can make it happen, but viable in a commercial environment) for mh? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 163
Current thread:
- mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Dave Crocker (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Tony Hain (Jul 07)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Petri Helenius (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)