nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture
From: David Andersen <dga+ () cs cmu edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:27:24 -0400
On Jul 1, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Eric Gauthier wrote:
Dave Clark is proposing that the NSF should fund a new demonstrationnetwork that implements a fundamentally new architecture at many levels.Not that I want to throw any more fire on this, but I think the article is talking about National Lambda Rail. From what I've seen, this is supposed to be a next-generation Internet2 based on wavelengths instead of pipes. I don't know a lot about it but, from what I've seen, my impression is this. Keep in mind that I'm not really involved with the NLR stuff directly, so my thoughtsare really as an outsider looking in.
To clarify a bit: Dave Clark is talking about a new, proposed research agenda for networking research that emphasizes the heck out of making the research become real and relevant. He's not talking about building an NLR or an Internet2, though both NLR and I2 are resources that can and probably will be used as a part of the demonstration network, if the project really takes off.
In fact, Fergie's later comment "... We're pretty far along in our current architecture to 'fundamentally' change" is actually the root of what I think DC is trying to get at. I think it's a very reasonable question to ask: Is the Internet heading towards a local maxima? (I don't know the answer!) What is it possible to change in today's Internet? Imagine a couple of things that seem desirable:
If research came up with an improved inter-domain routing protocol that had faster convergence, better security and better stability than BGP, but that was unfortunately in no way backwards compatible, could we deploy it?
A solution to DDoS that required another change to the basic IP packet format?
An improved intra-domain management and control system?Of those, some seem possible -- particularly the latter, given that it could be deployed by a single ISP on its own, giving it (ideally!) a competitive advantage over others. A BGP replacement, if the designers/ietf/etc. couldn't figure out a way to make it backwards compatable? Not so sure. Another IP packet format change, after all of the pain of trying to get IPv6 deployed?
Perhaps more of the answers to these questions would be "yes" if it were possible to demonstrate - at scale - that the new protocols were actually effective and worthwhile. Or perhaps the answers would be "yes" if that demonstration network exploded in popularity because it had those features, and the NSF found itself with another Internet on its hands. :)
I think it's these kind of questions that Dave Clark is trying to get at, much more than just trying to build a really fast demonstration network.
Is the clean-slate approach the way to go? I don't know. It could work out well, or perhaps academia would be better served by sending more of our students to summer internships at ISPs who're doing innovative things. I do know that Dave Clark is a damn smart guy, and he does have TCP under his belt loops. Sometimes you have to aim for the sky...
Disclaimer: While I've heard some of the discussion about this proposal, I'm speaking only for myself on this one.
-Dave
Current thread:
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture, (continued)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Michael . Dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Daniel Roesen (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Michael . Dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Simon Waters (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 05)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Lixia Zhang (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Eric Gauthier (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture David Andersen (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Kristoff (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Chris Kilbourn (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture J.D. Falk (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Joel Jaeggli (Jul 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- RE: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Scott Morris (Jul 03)