nanog mailing list archives
Re: Two Tiered Internet
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:48:36 +0000
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:39:51AM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:59:44AM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote:Since the model is based around cash, there is no perception except you pay, you get priority. Someone has to pay for the Internet. The users aren't.hum... then what am i getting for my monthly 4000+ bills from telcos and ISPs for "data services" and "internet transit" services?You don't get priority. :-) -M<
but do i get "the Internet"? ... your claim is that i am not paying for it. my bills indicate that i -am- paying for it. (regardless of priority... after all, the Internet is "best-effort" ... and w/ QoS, i don't get that anymore... i get the choice to buy crap instead of best effort...) Best effort is the top-tier of the QoS/priority pyramid... as sad as that is. and as others have cleverly pointed out, what i really am buying is full employment for the AP departments of telco/isps. :) --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Two Tiered Internet, (continued)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Jared Mauch (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Joe Shen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Two Tiered Internet John Dupuy (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Joe Maimon (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Marshall Eubanks (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Chris Owen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet JC Dill (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Michael Loftis (Dec 19)