nanog mailing list archives
RE: Two Tiered Internet
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:59:44 -0500
--- Joe McGuckin <joe () via net> wrote:What good is 6Mbit DSL from my ISP (say, SBC for example) if only a small portion of the net (sites that pay for non-degraded access) loads at a reasonable speed and everything else sucks?There are two possible ways of having a tiered system - one is to degrade competitors/those who don't pay, and the other is to offer a premium service to those who do pay. Would your perception of those two scenarios be identical?
Since the model is based around cash, there is no perception except you pay, you get priority. Someone has to pay for the Internet. The users aren't. -M<
Current thread:
- Re: Two Tiered Internet, (continued)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Tony Li (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Tony Li (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Jeff McAdams (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Edward B. Dreger (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Jared Mauch (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Joe Shen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Two Tiered Internet John Dupuy (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Joe Maimon (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Marshall Eubanks (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Chris Owen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet JC Dill (Dec 14)