nanog mailing list archives
Re: botted hosts
From: abuse () cabal org uk (Peter Corlett)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:48:37 +0000 (UTC)
Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi> wrote: [...]
If the nanog readership is a few thousands, that's only ~5-10k for each of us. Piece of cake. And I still don't buy the number. I might buy 2M.
If the nanog readership is a few thousands, I suspect most of the readership is small fry looking after a small amount of address space. For example, I'm pretty much lost on the radar given my purview is but a pair of /19s. Not everybody can be a Tier 1 provider... Even though my user base may not be considered the most well-behaved netizens (IRCNet I-lines were probably invented for them) I suspect that trying to find 5-10k rogue users in an address space covering about 16,000 hosts may still be a tad optimistic. -- PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse () mooli org uk for full key
Current thread:
- Re: botted hosts, (continued)
- Re: botted hosts Sean Donelan (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Alex Bligh (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts Sean Donelan (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- RE: botted hosts Ejay Hire (Apr 07)
- Re: botted hosts Sean Donelan (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Paul Vixie (Apr 04)
- so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] J.D. Falk (Apr 04)