nanog mailing list archives
Re: botted hosts
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:09:09 -0400
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:45:01 CDT, John Dupuy said:
MODEL A: ISPs filter at the source; spam is reduced
MODEL B: ISPs filter incoming mail traffic; spam is reduced. ISP's increase the effectiveness of blacklists and locating dynamic
Which model really provides us with the best of both worlds: less spam yet more freedom to innovate? I would say model A does. However, I am not convinced of this. Please pick apart my models..
Obviously, the filtering has to be done at least at one end. And although it would be nice if I lived in a world where the ISP originating the mail was filtering it, I don't live there. So unless you have a *realistic* proposal to make all the spam-haven ISPs find religion, see the light, and oust their spammers *without* the "do it or be blocked everyplace" (your plan B), it's not going to happen in our lifetime...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: The power of default configurations, (continued)
- Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations just me (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Mark Andrews (Apr 06)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts John Dupuy (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts John Dupuy (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Dean Anderson (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Dean Anderson (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Tony Finch (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 05)