nanog mailing list archives
Re: botted hosts
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:43:33 +0530
On Apr 4, 2005 2:18 PM, Dave Rand <dlr () bungi com> wrote:
But why do you think it is right to shift the burden on the recipient to block access, when it could be done at the source. Yes, it means that the people getting the cash from the customer would have to actually support said customer by making it non-annoying for them.
On that point - here's what Carl Hutzler has to say. Several of you have read it before on circleid, or on the list where Carl's email was first posted, but anyway.. http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/ -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: The power of default configurations, (continued)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 06)
- Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 07)
- Re: The power of default configurations just me (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Apr 08)
- Re: The power of default configurations Mark Andrews (Apr 06)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts John Dupuy (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts John Dupuy (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Dean Anderson (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Apr 05)