nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer?
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:41:13 +0100 (IST)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Steve Francis wrote:
I thought it was standard best practice for availability, like for root name servers. I thought it was not a good "closest server" selection mechanism, as you'll be going to the closest server as determined by BGP - which may have little relationship to the server with lowest RTT. It'd be nice to see some metrics wither way....
For anycast within an organisation, it will be as determined by the IGP, not BGP.
regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: Genius, n.: A chemist who discovers a laundry additive that rhymes with "bright."
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer?, (continued)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? James (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Bill Woodcock (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Paul Vixie (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Steve Francis (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Patrick W Gilmore (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Bill Woodcock (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Steve Francis (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Duane Wessels (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Paul Jakma (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 02)