nanog mailing list archives
Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein)
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:19:31 +0300
Joe Johnson wrote:
Making NAT illegal is a good idea, however it was done for all the wrong reasons.All this hit here in Illinois when the Super DCMA took effect, and it technically became illegal to use a router in your home (as the Illinois DCMA restricts the ability to hide the source or destination of any electronic communication, kinda like NAT). I certainly didn't pull NAT off my home or my office connections! I think no one has been called down (e.g., no one has challenged) on the law, but I could be arrested at any time for running a basic Netgear router on my broadband at home.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein) Petri Helenius (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein) Petri Helenius (Sep 01)
- Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein) Henry Linneweh (Sep 02)
- Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein) Petri Helenius (Sep 02)
- Re: Definition of P2P (was Feinstein) Henry Linneweh (Sep 02)