![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: European Nanog?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:11:41 -1000
I would much appreciate if EOF gets more input from "RIPE" operators.
this is a problem with eof, nanog, apricot, ... the actual running and decision-making is not done by operators. it is done by the usual well-meaning people representing operators. and, of course, they are in extreme, and almost amusing, denial that there is a difference. i am not sure how foro de redes is currently operated; it used to be heavily operator run. it is interesting to note that afnog is organized and run pretty much by operators. i guess they can't afford net.bureaucrats to represent them :-). randy
Current thread:
- RE: European Nanog?, (continued)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Roland Perry (Sep 14)
- Re: European Nanog? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Paul G (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 12)
- Re: European Nanog? Ken Gilmour (Sep 13)