nanog mailing list archives
Re: European Nanog?
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:46:21 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 13.09.2004 11:18 Neil J. McRae wrote:Too many nogs- The RIPE NCC ran a Euro Operators forum that was probably the most useful.1. EOF is still alive though hardly visible/audible. 2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
I'd agree that RIPE is the forum tho, it *is* the foremost industry forum for policies and is well established. Too many splinter groups already... Steve
Current thread:
- Re: European Nanog?, (continued)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Roland Perry (Sep 14)
- Re: European Nanog? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Paul G (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 12)
- Re: European Nanog? Ken Gilmour (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Sabri Berisha (Sep 13)