nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Make love, not spam"....
From: "james edwards" <hackerwacker () cybermesa com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:14:18 -0700
I am not saying that the proposal is intrinsically right or wrong, I am saying it could have merit if just in waking up a brain-dead co-lo facility operator to deal with spamming clients. -mm
How would this method be more effective than the e-mails, faxes, blocklists, and phonecalls that have been used in the past ? James H. Edwards Routing and Security Administrator At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa jamesh () cybermesa com noc () cybermesa com http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM (505) 795-7101
Current thread:
- RE: "Make love, not spam"...., (continued)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Scott Weeks (Nov 29)
- Re: "Make love, not spam".... Rich Kulawiec (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Hannigan, Martin (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Hannigan, Martin (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Jerry Pasker (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Hannigan, Martin (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Hannigan, Martin (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Miller, Mark (Nov 29)
- Re: "Make love, not spam".... Chris Adams (Nov 29)
- RE: "Make love, not spam".... Miller, Mark (Nov 29)
- Re: "Make love, not spam".... james edwards (Nov 29)