nanog mailing list archives
Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:33:55 -0800
Pekka, All of the examples I referenced (which I unfortunately cannot namedue to NDA) fit exactly the model you are referring to. They advertise a small
number of prefixes from a small number of sites to cover a very large and diverse number of sites. They advertise the same set of prefixes from the same ASN in each of those sites. In cases where they are using VPN for backbone, they use PA space for the VPN terminators and do not advertise more specifics to accommodate this. Hope that helps. Owen--On Monday, November 22, 2004 9:11 PM +0200 Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:While I would never argue there are companies who do not push internal data over the Internet, I am surprised you think that proves no company pushes internal data over the Internet.i don't. my assertion is that there are significant networks that don't ever touch what we think of as the "internet" but still use IP to push datagrams around... and attempting to marginalize them as "fringe" networks that must use non-global addresses is, imho, arrogent at best.I'm not sure anyone is marginalizing them. The point just is that are those very big, international networks advertising the same aggregate in all the places they (publicly) connect to the net, and no more specifics anywhere? I.e., what I'd like to see is a couple of example of international big enterprises which would not need to advertise the more specifics to Internet anywhere. How rare is this? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
-- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32), (continued)
- Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 23)
- large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 21)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 21)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 23)
- Level 3 NOC information. Majid Farid (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Todd Mitchell - lists (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 23)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 23)