nanog mailing list archives
Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:55:11 -0500
On Nov 22, 2004, at 1:48 PM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
Internet connectivity, because transporting all the traffic over links or VPNs is a pretty heavy businessthis is an assertion which many have claimed is false. based on empericial evidence.Care to offer a couple of examples of this empirical evidence ?attached. care to provide counter examples?
While I would never argue there are companies who do not push internal data over the Internet, I am surprised you think that proves no company pushes internal data over the Internet.
As for counter examples, I know of a few, but confidentiality does not allow me to discuss corporate network topology on a public mailing list. Does this mean it never happens (i.e. I am lying)? If you believe that, so be it. However, the facts are still the facts, no matter what your belief is.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?], (continued)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 27)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Nils Ketelsen (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Nils Ketelsen (Nov 22)
- Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Sean Donelan (Nov 22)
- Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 23)
- large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 21)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 21)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 23)