nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
From: Ted Hardie <hardie () qualcomm com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:59:08 -0800
At 3:37 PM -0500 11/8/04, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In That said, see draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-07.txt In not very different form, it's likely to be approved soon by the IESG.
With due respect to my colleague Steve, I think this depends on what "not very different from" means. I'm currently holding a DISCUSS on this document, forreasons related to the ones Leo raised. In particular, I strongly believe that allocating
this space: This document only allocates the prefix (FC00::/8) for centrally assigned local IPv6 addresses. The characteristics and technical allocation requirements for centrally assigned Local IPv6 addresses will be defined in a separate document. is very unwise. One of the problems with site local was the prefix got allocated but the work on what it would mean never got full community support. Doing the same thing twice just strikes me as dumb. I have some other very serious concerns about the extent to which the document presumes that these will be routed between ASes without recognizing that this means they could become the v6 swamp. So this discussion is *not* over, and I believe comments from operators to the WG and to the IESG are still very appropriate. regards, Ted Hardie
Current thread:
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested, (continued)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Abley (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Eric Gauthier (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Daniel Roesen (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Daniel Roesen (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Sascha Lenz (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Ted Hardie (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeroen Massar (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Alex Bligh (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Måns Nilsson (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeroen Massar (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Pekka Savola (Nov 09)