nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco HFR
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 07:39:09 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Incorrect. There are transponders that put a 40G signal in a 10G DWDM optical system. (You have to move a step up from morse code to make the side-bands fit..) And they atleast run in 80 chanel systems.
What is the range of this, how often do you need to amplify and regen the 40G signal compared to 10G? Can 10G optical amplifiers be used? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco HFR, (continued)
- RE: Cisco HFR Burton, Chris (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Eric Kuhnke (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Eric Kuhnke (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Michel Py (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Andy Dills (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Simon Lockhart (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Andy Dills (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kevin Oberman (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Burton, Chris (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Burton, Chris (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Peter Lothberg (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Peter Lothberg (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Henry Linneweh (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Hannigan, Martin (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Tomas Daniska (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Williams, Jeff (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Herman Harless (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Ryan Dobrynski (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Michel Py (May 27)