nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: "Jon R. Kibler" <Jon.Kibler () aset com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:51:58 -0400
Bob Martin wrote:
Anything I/we can do to help the cause? Bob Martin Quoted from different thread:(note that verisign has amended their complaint against icann (since the court dismissed the first one) and i'm now named as a co-conspirator. if you reply to this message, there's a good chance of your e-mail appearing in court filings at some point.) -- Paul Vixie
OK, I have obviously missed something here... I know that the courts dismissed the original complaint against ICANN, but what has happened since, and what is this about some conspiracy? Are they trying to say that users of the anti-SiteFinder BIND patch are conspirators? Thanks! Jon Kibler -- Jon R. Kibler Chief Technical Officer A.S.E.T., Inc. Charleston, SC USA (843) 849-8214 ================================================== Filtered by: TRUSTEM.COM's Email Filtering Service http://www.trustem.com/ No Spam. No Viruses. Just Good Clean Email.
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 20)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jon R. Kibler (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Henry Linneweh (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN David Lesher (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Curran (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Vincent J. Bono (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 18)