Re: /24s run amuck

["John Palmer" <nanog () adns net>]

And then there are the upstreams that filter legacy /24's 
Seen that too...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Cc: "Patrick Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: /24s run amuck


> On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> > > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require
> > > > things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(
> > >
> > >
> > > Wonderful...
> > >
> > > mh
> >
> > Easy to fix by changing to "covering N million IP addresses" - but, 
> > then,
> > that becomes an address space conservation issue.
>
> Yeah, that makes sense 'cause the utility of my network is directly 
> related to the number of IPs in it.
>
> Er, um, uh....  Maybe not.
>
> -- 
> TTFN,
> patrick