nanog mailing list archives

Re: /24s run amuck


From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:13:36 -0500


On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:

On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:

Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require
things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(


Wonderful...

mh

Easy to fix by changing to "covering N million IP addresses" - but, then,
that becomes an address space conservation issue.

Yeah, that makes sense 'cause the utility of my network is directly related to the number of IPs in it.

Er, um, uh....  Maybe not.

--
TTFN,
patrick


Current thread: