nanog mailing list archives
RE: Smallest Transit MTU
From: "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew () eeph com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:56:17 -0800
David Schwartz:
IMO, it's negligent to configure a firewall to pass traffic whose meaning is not known.
I see. Can you suggest a firewall that supports "block all traffic not unencrypted and in American English"? That'd probably stop the kids who insist on substituting numbers for letters, at the very least. Matthew Kaufman matthew () eeph com Ps. For my overseas deployments, I'll need some other languages supported as well.
Current thread:
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU, (continued)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 31)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Scott Weeks (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Matthew Kaufman (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)