nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:29:58 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Dan Hollis:Because tcp connection endpoints have to implement ECN in order to manage the flow.Your wording suggests that ECN is purely an end-to-end signaling protocol
it does? where?
(and so does a lot of propaganda from the ECN zealots).
an "ecn zealot" is someone who wants firewalls to work correctly? someone who wants idiots to stop blocking all icmp a "pmtud zealot"?
But is this really true? If I read the RFC correctly, you need *routers* that use ECN to indicate congestion instead of packet drops.
anything along the path can *indicate* congestion, but its up to the *endpoints* to *respond* to the ECN indication and mitigate their flows. read rfc3168 paying close attention to 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 -Dan
Current thread:
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU, (continued)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 31)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Scott Weeks (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Matthew Kaufman (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)