nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:53:55 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Jerry Pasker wrote:
Is there an RFC that clearly states: "The internet needs to transit 1500 byte packets without fragmentation."??
Actually the bigger problem imo is the number of sites which block ECN http://urchin.earth.li/ecn/ Even worse are the networks which incorrectly block the new allocations eg 69.0.0.0/8 - http://not69box.atlantic.net/ - the list is worryingly large. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU, (continued)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Daniel Hagerty (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Alex Bligh (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Edward B. Dreger (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 31)