nanog mailing list archives
RE: no whois info ?
From: Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 14:59:44 -0500
At 02:44 PM 09/12/2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Perhaps 100% of spammers hide their registration data when possible, but I wouldn't say that 100% of hidden registrations are spammers. An RBL option of this type of data would probably mean forced elimination of a benefit to the public - privacy.
There has to be a balance between expectations to privacy when participating in a public space (the internet). Putting your name and address behind a domain is not unreasonable in my mind. You are afterall publishing DNS info, so its not a case of total privacy.
I use RBLs to score messages, not reject them.---Mike
Current thread:
- Re: no whois info ?, (continued)
- Re: no whois info ? Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Mike Tancsa (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Peter John Hill (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Peter Corlett (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? Elmar K. Bins (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? william(at)elan.net (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? Peter Corlett (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Dec 10)
- Message not available
- RE: no whois info ? Mike Tancsa (Dec 09)