nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated
From: Gerald <gcoon () inch com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, David Lesher wrote:
The way to solve the Verislime problem is straightforward, but not simple. Make it unprofitable for them.
...can't resist hitting reply. First there is little to no way to make this unprofitable for them since they already have people paying for the opportunity to catch the eyes of these lost Internet travellers. Second, it would have to be a negative cash flow to be nixed in a corporate setting. ("unprofitable" does not necessarily convey: negative cash flow) Ugh...sucked in. Can we get back to network operation discussions. Someone make a Verisign gripe/commiserate list. I'll sign up. G - How are ya? Never been better, ... Just once I'd like to be better.
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Daniel Roesen (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated E.B. Dreger (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated David Lesher (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gerald (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated jlewis (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew S. Hallacy (Sep 21)
- RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric Germann (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Richard Cox (Sep 22)