nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated
From: Richard Cox <Richard () mandarin com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:02:00 +0100
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:42:51 +0100 Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote: | Meanwhile, I would have diverted a copy of the mailserver | communications at the Ethernet switch to a secret server that | does the actual logging of addresses and messages. | | Son of Carnivore? Son? or Brother? See: http://lists.insecure.org/lists/politech/2002/Oct/0009.html -- Richard
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated David Lesher (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gerald (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Joe Provo (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated jlewis (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew S. Hallacy (Sep 21)
- RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric Germann (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Jack Bates (Sep 22)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Michael . Dillon (Sep 22)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Michael . Dillon (Sep 22)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Richard Cox (Sep 22)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated George William Herbert (Sep 22)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gregory Hicks (Sep 25)