nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:31:27 -0400
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:01:39PM -0400, Matt Larson wrote: [snip]
We are interested in feedback on the best way within the SMTP protocol to definitively reject mail at these servers. One alternate option we
[snip] Wrong protocol. There should be *NO* SMTP transactions for non-extistant domains. -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Daniel Roesen (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated E.B. Dreger (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated David Lesher (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gerald (Sep 25)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated jlewis (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew S. Hallacy (Sep 21)
- RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric Germann (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Richard Cox (Sep 22)