nanog mailing list archives
Re: Windows updates and dial up users
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:00:51 -0400
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:45:13 -0000, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
Ok then different idea, assuming that we're all agreed its MS's responsibility to ensure users are patched promptly and without extra cost to the end user.
You agree. I agree. Microsoft doesn't agree, and based on the fact that the user presumably agreed to the EULA as phrased, the users don't either. After all, if the users didn't like the current support, they're free to change vendors. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Windows updates and dial up users Sean Donelan (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Roy Bentley (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jerry Eyers (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Richard Cox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Henry Yen (Sep 23)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jonathan Hunter (Sep 22)