nanog mailing list archives
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:57:10 -0500
Andy Walden wrote:
I'm not necessarily making a statement one way or the other on port 25 filtering, but SMTP Auth, when properly configured and protected against brute force attacks is certainly a useful thing. YMMV of course.
Keyloggers are popular in the same viruses that install open proxies. :) -Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135?, (continued)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Rob Thomas (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Ray Bellis (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? David B Harris (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Ray Bellis (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Niels Bakker (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Richard Cox (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Margie (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Andy Walden (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Margie (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Sep 22)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Sean Donelan (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sep 20)
- Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? Sean Donelan (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? John Kristoff (Sep 21)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sep 20)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? jlewis (Sep 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Sep 21)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sep 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Sep 23)
- Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Sep 23)