nanog mailing list archives
Re: Windows updates and dial up users
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:02:57 -0700
Ok then different idea, assuming that we're all agreed its MS's responsibility to ensure users are patched promptly and without extra cost to the end user.
The problem is that while we agree, Micr0$0ft does not. They feel they should have no "responsibility" whatsoever to the end user beyond cheerfully refunding
their money if they decide to stop using Windows. They are of the opinion that they are patching these things out of the goodness of their hart as a favor and in the interests of above-and-beyond customer service. I do not understand why people continue to do business with such an arrogant self-serving organization which has repeatedly demonstrated a completely a-moral approach to business. Just my opinion. Owen
Current thread:
- Windows updates and dial up users Sean Donelan (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Roy Bentley (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jerry Eyers (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Richard Cox (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 22)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Henry Yen (Sep 23)
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jonathan Hunter (Sep 22)