nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Path Filtering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 02:57:29 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Joe Abley wrote:
I think that the message "community strings are hard" (like its friends "BGP is hard" and "let's turn on RIP") need to stop propagating. It is just not that difficult to do things right the first time, and you don't need to be a bigger network than a pair of 2501s with a small handful of external BGP sessions to see the benefit of it.
As long as you get it right, I'm less concern how you do it. If you are more comfortable using route maps and communities, go ahead and do it that way. If you are more comfortable using prefix filters, go ahead and do it that way. If you are more comfortable using route servers and RPSL, go ahead and do it that way. Its not that difficult to use RPSL, and it would be nice if everyone did it right the first time. But I also recognize if there are several tools to available, different people will have their favorite.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Path Filtering, (continued)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Stephen J. Wilcox (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Joe Abley (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Joe Abley (May 17)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 17)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 17)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering alex (May 18)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Mark Radabaugh (May 16)