nanog mailing list archives
RE: IRR/RADB and BGP
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak () ai net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:43:03 -0400
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the peering agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies were properly registered, securing the Internet would be a lot closer to being possible.
Is it safe to assume (now) that all the routes one would care to listen to (under normal circumstances) are registered in an IRR now? I remember there used to be well-known issues with some networks, especially internationally. Deepak Jain AiNET
Current thread:
- IRR/RADB and BGP Vandy Hamidi (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Kevin Oberman (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Jake Khuon (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Deepak Jain (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Michael Hallgren (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 22)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 22)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Ejay Hire (Jun 20)