nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRR/RADB and BGP
From: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:14:16 -0500
Vandy Hamidi wrote: Our new ISP is asking that I create a maintainer object in the RADB and associated AS/Routes for us to be about to eBGP peer. This is the first time I've been asked by a provider to do this for something as simple as peering to advertise a couple /24's. I've peered with ATT, Sprint, UUnet, Qwest, Savvis, SBC, and Internap in the past and never had to do anything but have a valid ASN provided by ARIN.
Hey, wait a minute! You've peered with SBCIS and not set up an aut-num and route objects in the RADB? For shame! That's our policy, too. Get with it!
Is this just so they can dynamically build their prefix/as-path lists?
It's to avoid having Sprint mocked by L3.
Why would I need to do this and what advantages are there. Cost to register with RADB is $250/year and I want to understand it before I shell out.
Use ARIN's IRR or AltDB, then. But wouldn't it be nice to support the RADB, and our good friends at Merit? Heck, you could donate a few grand -- I'm sure they'd accept it. Peter E. Fry
Current thread:
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP, (continued)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Kevin Oberman (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Jake Khuon (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Deepak Jain (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Michael Hallgren (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 22)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 22)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)