nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?
From: Peter Salus <peter () matrix net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:26:36 -0600
Though it was written nearly two years ago, John Quarterman's "Monoculture Considered Harmful" remains the very best exposition of this issue. //www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_2/quarterman/ Peter
Current thread:
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?, (continued)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Alif The Terrible (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Mathew Lodge (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Mathew Lodge (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Florian Weimer (Jan 29)
- Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Joseph T. Klein (Jan 29)
- Re: Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Peter Salus (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Leo Bicknell (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Vadim Antonov (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 29)